The assassination of Osama bin Laden generated, as it should have, a considerable amount of coverage from all over the political spectrum. As the discussion progressed, but before hard-hitting questions could be explored, camps inevitably formed. From my perspective, radio and TV pundit Ed Schultz took a lead position in the “Rah-rah” camp. This group decided early on that the President and his advisors should be supported, no matter what. As long as they said things should have been done, that’s pretty much good enough for them. I don’t consider myself to be a member of this camp. I continue to have serious reservations about how the operation was carried out and worry about what kind of a precedent was set for future executives, including Barack Obama in the near future.
As many know, Michael Moore and others also don’t consider themselves members of this camp. For this, they were called out by Schultz and the “Rah-rah” camp. Schultz called Moore and others who expressed their reservations “intellectual hand-wringers”. I personally found it offensive that citizens trying to demand answers from a Democratic President were insulted by a Rah-rah-er. Schultz and other so-called liberals bashed conservatives for years for falling in line behind the Bush Regime and not performing their required duties as American citizens.