Some things I’ve come across recently:
New mega-map details all the ways climate change will affect our everyday lives. We’ll need more resources like this to help personalize climate change effects. With personalization will come motivation to act. It’s not a panacea, but a good start.
Is your state one of the 10 most energy-efficient US states? Mine (Colorado) isn’t. More context: the US is good at buzzwords, but lousy at implementing policies that increase energy efficiency. Although it’s a good thing that China is currently ranked #4 globally – they’ll have much less legacy infrastructure than the US and other developed nations to upgrade in the future.
This might be news to some: climate models that did the best at portraying natural ocean cycles the best also did better than their peers when projecting the recent surface warming pause. What most people don’t understand is that each climate model run portrays one individual potential outcome. That said, scientists don’t claim that individual models make perfect predictions. The recent warming trend is well within the range of available projections. Many skeptics, of course, gloss over this important detail when they falsely claim the models are no good. How much time do those same skeptics spend on financial projections, anyway?
This has the potential for misinterpretation and misuse: climate worriers don’t, on average, use less electricity than those who don’t worry about the climate (at least according to a very small UK study). They use more. This will continue the claims of hypocrisy by skeptics, and perhaps justifiably so. My net utility use is 14% to 17% of the average American’s 903 kilowatthours (kWh) per month: 125-150 kWh per month during the past year. That’s in a modern home with AC, computers, and smartphones. People can use much less than they currently do with a modern lifestyle. They just don’t prioritize it.
Continuing on the theme of energy efficiency and waste: we waste 80 billion USD per year due to inefficient electronic devices. Wow. And it doesn’t have to be that way: simple measures could save billions of dollars if we implemented them. Priorities.
Random thought: poverty-wage employers always ask if people would be willing to pay more for products if they paid their employees living wages. I haven’t come across an easy rebuttal: were customers asked if they were willing to pay more for products if they paid their executives millions of dollars with guaranteed golden parachutes? Guess what most people would rather support? That’s right, the folks in their communities, not executives in their fenced off country club homes.