Weatherdem's Weblog

Bridging climate science, citizens, and policy

Pickens Finally Pushes His Real Plan


T. Boone Pickens, the multi-billionaire oilman who helped fund horribly immoral ads against Democratic candidates came out with the Pickens Plan last year.  After looking it over, it was easy to see he was using his wind energy plan as a front for an alternative goal.  After looking into it a little further, it became obvious that Pickens only wanted to look ‘green’ so that he could control a larger portion of the natural gas market, then sell that natural gas as part of a transportation sector makeover, so that he could make billions more.  Which he’s free to do, of course, in our messed up semi-market-based economy.  I wrote three posts on Pickens before feeling comfortable that he wasn’t likely to succeed in his ridiculous plan any time soon –

Bad Energy Plan & Hypocritical Representatives

Pope, Podesta and Pickens: Energy Policies and Climate Change

T. Boone’s Millions and the Corporate Media

What makes Pickens unethical is he tried to sell the American people on something that he wasn’t going to follow up on.  He hid his true intentions, as evidenced by an op-ed that the Cons on the Denver Post’s editorial board printed today.  “Look to natural gas as solution” is the title.  Finally, we get to hear about what T. Boone really wants to do.

That being said, I still disagree with his proposal.  Instead of gasoline, he wants vehicles to run off of natural gas.  Say what?!  Yes, that’s right: natural gas.  Because America might have up to 100 years’ worth of natural gas underneath our own soil.  Because we need to get off of foreign oil, according to T. Boone.  Well, that sounds lovely.  But he still largely ignores the climate crisis.

It would take 25-50 years to get natural gas drilling and delivery infrastructure up to anywhere near where today’s oil infrastructure exists.  Take population growth and other factors into consideration, and that 100 years’ worth of natural gas will head south quickly.  So we’d end up where we are today: a critical resource would be dwindling, foreign entities would control theirs and speculators would jack up the market (unless regulatory reform were enacted).  Then what?  What’s left when oil and natural gas have run out?  Renewables.

But clean energy infrastructure would take another 25-50 years to set up in a national transportation network.  So even if there were miraculously more natural gas available than currently wished for, or even if it took a little less time to set that infrastructure up (not likely given today’s crippling deficits), we’d be in worse shape in 75-100 years for having developed natural gas infrastructure instead of clean energy infrastructure.  Or we could do it right the first time.  In the process, we actually would kill two proverbial birds with one stone.  Our transportation sector would be better off (our national security would therefore benefit) and our greenhouse forcing would decrease faster – mitigating the worst effects of catastrophic climate change.  Think it through and the choice becomes pretty easy to make.  Oh – there is one disadvantage – not going Pickens’ route wouldn’t let him make billions more dollars while we’re stuck with a 20th century transportation system late into the 21st or even into the early 22nd century.  That’s what the Pickens’ Plan is all about.


2 thoughts on “Pickens Finally Pushes His Real Plan

  1. I think you need to accept that something is better than nothing. Pickens has made a major shift in his ideas and burning CH4 (methane) results in a 60 or 70% reduction in Co2/BTU. A 30% reduction today or within 10 years may be as important as 60 or 80% in 30 or 40 years since C02 effects can last 200 years or more. If dems reduce their Co2 by 80% and republicans not at all, we just cant get to where we need to be.If pickens can bring a sizable # of republicans along more power to him. A dose of realism is needed here.

  2. Fine – you tell future generations that you were in favor of a plan to do a little now to reduce their suffering by a little more instead of pushing a plan to do a lot now to reduce their suffering immeasurably more.

    Pickens’ plan will not reduce CO2 emissions by 30% today, tomorrow, next year or the year after that. 60%-80% reductions will not happen within the next 10 years with his plan. Pickens’ plan enriches himself and leaves Americans holding the bag. He’ll be dead before the effects of his enrichment scheme become obvious to most Americans. Then what?

    If Pickens wants to bring a majority of Republicans on-board a realistic energy plan, there’s one out there. But he won’t, because that’s not what he’s about. When the pro-dirty energy crowd makes their presence felt at town halls, will Pickens decry their activities and lead them toward the solution that’s out there? I have my suspicions that he won’t. We’ll see in a couple of weeks’ time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s