<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Climate Change/Energy Bill &#8211; 2nd Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weatherdem.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/2009-climate-changeenergy-bill-2nd-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weatherdem.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/2009-climate-changeenergy-bill-2nd-update/</link>
	<description>Bridging climate science, citizens, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Change News &#8211; 5/19/09: Glaciers and GHG emissions &#171; Weatherdem&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://weatherdem.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/2009-climate-changeenergy-bill-2nd-update/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate Change News &#8211; 5/19/09: Glaciers and GHG emissions &#171; Weatherdem&#8217;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weatherdem.wordpress.com/?p=3302#comment-1645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 31% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 76% below 2005 levels by 2050.  As I discussed yesterday, the Discussion Draft has been weakened already.  Once the final bill is signed into law, I look forward to seeing analyzed estimates from WRI and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 31% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 76% below 2005 levels by 2050.  As I discussed yesterday, the Discussion Draft has been weakened already.  Once the final bill is signed into law, I look forward to seeing analyzed estimates from WRI and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
